Collective
Consciousness
Vigilance brothers and sisters, vigilance.
I just enjoyed a DVD production by Stephen Hawking called, "Into The Universe with Stephen Hawking" He is a fascinating cosmologist and a brilliant theorist amongst other things--one of them being that he is a quadriplegic. That's one of the amazing things about growth in a civilization--that is, its ability to provide for its physically disadvantaged citizens. By being a cosmologist, I hardly believe that Mr. Hawking was financially disadvantaged, prior to his appointment, given his hardy acceptance and recognition amongst the prominent and wealthy -- despite his physical encumbrances, as well as, his appearance.
Westerners are funny that way. I recognize by his difficulties, that either he, or the family he comes from--maybe even both--must have had a lot of confidence in him; giving him full support and sparing no expense: Jobs like his are usually designated for those well-off financially, and the type of respect he has in the field (as well as the money spent for that type of film production) will not come solely through the acknowledgement of his brilliance: That's like going to school for monument sculpture, in bronze and brass: Who does that, without being intimately familiar with the types of people who can afford to purchase that sort of thing. His wheel chair equipment was high-tech alright; equipped with a computerized voice reproduction system, to compensate for his speech impediments.
He is quite an entertaining scientist, including real imaginative ideas to illustrate his theories, theorems, interpolations and extrapolations. He kept me entertained like watching a Gordon Parks Movie (like the original Shaft or the Learning Tree)! Mr. Hawking spoke about the future stages of our sun--from it's current state, becoming a red sun, and its eventual nova. He elaborated on how the same planets our sun gave life within our solar system, will eventually be destroyed by the fantastic heat of the red sun, that our sun will inevitably become. Mr. Hawking then interpolated, elaborating that the nearest habitable planet--given the fastest ship available--would take an access of about two hundred years to reach its' destination: Estimating better technology would have to be pursued, how the trip would be financed, etc.
I just enjoyed a DVD production by Stephen Hawking called, "Into The Universe with Stephen Hawking" He is a fascinating cosmologist and a brilliant theorist amongst other things--one of them being that he is a quadriplegic. That's one of the amazing things about growth in a civilization--that is, its ability to provide for its physically disadvantaged citizens. By being a cosmologist, I hardly believe that Mr. Hawking was financially disadvantaged, prior to his appointment, given his hardy acceptance and recognition amongst the prominent and wealthy -- despite his physical encumbrances, as well as, his appearance.
Westerners are funny that way. I recognize by his difficulties, that either he, or the family he comes from--maybe even both--must have had a lot of confidence in him; giving him full support and sparing no expense: Jobs like his are usually designated for those well-off financially, and the type of respect he has in the field (as well as the money spent for that type of film production) will not come solely through the acknowledgement of his brilliance: That's like going to school for monument sculpture, in bronze and brass: Who does that, without being intimately familiar with the types of people who can afford to purchase that sort of thing. His wheel chair equipment was high-tech alright; equipped with a computerized voice reproduction system, to compensate for his speech impediments.
He is quite an entertaining scientist, including real imaginative ideas to illustrate his theories, theorems, interpolations and extrapolations. He kept me entertained like watching a Gordon Parks Movie (like the original Shaft or the Learning Tree)! Mr. Hawking spoke about the future stages of our sun--from it's current state, becoming a red sun, and its eventual nova. He elaborated on how the same planets our sun gave life within our solar system, will eventually be destroyed by the fantastic heat of the red sun, that our sun will inevitably become. Mr. Hawking then interpolated, elaborating that the nearest habitable planet--given the fastest ship available--would take an access of about two hundred years to reach its' destination: Estimating better technology would have to be pursued, how the trip would be financed, etc.
I thought about Mr. Hawkins physical conditions a lot, as I watch his brilliant theories on the future of humanity and this planet. Particularly, when he spoke about the planet being in danger of being destroyed, how he and his people hoped to have advanced technology to the point, where a spaceship could be built to fly to the nearest habitable planet--carrying HUMAN CARGO.
My question is, "Who would be on this ship?" As he spoke further, he extrapolated that most governments would probably not want to invest in such a project, since this ship would be leaving and never coming back. Brilliant deduction! Therefore he concluded, that the passengers would (in all likelihood) be the ones who could finance their own trip to RECOLONIZE on another planet--whether or whether not there would be other inhabitants. My third eye mind considered, "Oh, so only the extremely wealthy can afford to get away from a dying planet like planet Krypton (the comic book character Superman's home planet), so how many Blacks would be licensed to take such a trip or given such a special invite? And how typical a White way of thinking, to intrude on other inhabitants--invited or not!
I began to realize, how often when Whites are speaking about events and solutions for their own people--that we (as Black people) automatically begin to include ourselves in the equation--when (in reality), there is no real suggestion presented to support that theory. Meaning, when they say "for the future of our people," we Blacks in the West automatically think they mean all the people. Now what kind of fantasy are we living in: the same one that naively doesn't want to believe that Europe committed three holocausts against the Jewish people? The one that doesn't want to believe that there were more Black people lost at sea, as a result slavery in America--than all the Jews lost in the Holocaust? Maybe the one that doesn't believe that South Africa once had 85% of the indigenous Black population living on 15% of the land, while Whites used the rest of that land for personal ownership and recreational areas--like huge golf courses (meanwhile projecting an image that so-called Africa is a mismanaged wasteland of uncontrolled vegetation)?
By the deeds Westerners display around the world, concerning other indigenous people, I don't think the leadership in Kenya will be thinking that this Western rocket ship would be making accommodation for wealthy Blacks in their areas--particularly if they are not the British authorities that Mr. Hawking works in behalf of. Surely, the Black man in Central Asia could not have much confidence or faith, that he would be included on that ship constructed by the West: I don't believe, not even half as much, as this quadriplegic scientist obviously believed he would be included. And although this is British government we are talking about, I can't imagine--given the chronicle of the Blackman in America--why any of us Blacks, in the wilderness of North America, should believe we'd be in that number--either. Though, I'm very sure, there are quite a number of our own people who would believe that Blacks would be included.
Sometimes, I perceive we--as Black people--are too willing to go by our own beliefs, rather than face cold, hard facts! Nowhere, in the history of Whites, had Westerners done anything without their immediate benefit being considered and rewarded first! Nowhere, in the history of Western colonization, has the original inhabitants of colonized areas, ever fared out well by the considerations of Whites in those occupied areas!
Every other type of etnicity around the world has a "sob" story to tell, concerning the White man taking land and natural resources from their country, while getting very little or nothing comparable in return. This is in light of the fact--according to ethnogenesis--Whites are the last to appear in the chronology of man. So why should we believe that the policy has changed, given the practice of their White ancestry? And if we don't believe-- then why are we not sending our children to more engineering schools and taking advantage of the affirmative action programs, made to assist "minorities" in the fields of medicine and technology? Why are we not collectively preparing ourselves overall, on the basis of this awareness:
I am fully aware that it takes more effort to make things right--but while there is always difficulties associated with starting anything-- if there is no pain then there is no gain. . .
I guess, it makes things easier to sit back and do nothing--in reference to events--and let the next generation inherit the job of saving our species. Whites seem to worship, statistics, politics, theories, theorems-- while we Blacks seem to place too much on faith and the Creator making sure He "sees us through." While I subscribe to providence, and manifest destiny for Black people, I am not so crazy about all this vicarious and precarious behavior demonstrated by current day Blacks within the West-- particularly relying on other's sense of humanity without any very viable options.
Not that I'm so inclined to the excessive use of force, but of all the countries displaying nuclear capabilities and showcasing a space program--how many of these would you say are represented by people of substantial pigmentation? Really? Examine it for yourself...
I'm just saying though... When you don't have the ability to defend yourself, there's always bullies out there waiting to take advantage of your position. Just study the Faulklands Crisis [two articles]. Implied--but not stated--that because these islands had names for water bodies, their must have been indigenous people before the English and Spain "discovered" the Fauklands...
I am not saying that there has not been improvement in the West, concerning their sense of humanity (I suppose), but as another group of people with a separate destiny--why should we depend on anyone else to be fair--for us to get equal rights and privileges in the dual society in which we live? It is as if the known world believes the world should be ruled by a Western hand. Given our ethnogenesis--we should have better options than the ones presently presented. Imagine your kid--all grown up as a behemoth, asking you to do something nicely, while toting a big club behind his back--just in case you don't )... Looking like Teddy Roosevelt.
But I digress. This is not even my overall topic or my perspective. It is not about might and such, but I just thought you should be aware of what is the obvious playing field (at least to my persons). Now back to self development of the mental kind...
It is quite difficult to understand why as a people, we continue this tenuous relationship with the West. Some times when an animal is abused enough, the pain becomes ordinary and the animal gets accustomed to such behavior. Hopefully this is not the case with us in America. My heart does not want to believe that, but regardless--I will accept that if it is true. Yet, I see efforts being made in small clusters. I just consider that some of you were like me in my previous life-- I just was not aware of so much and therefore I didn't do much-- but once I found out... And that is just it: If you sincerely seek, you will find/ if you knock the door will open-- but only if you mean it. You show you mean it by your actions. If you know better, then you show you mean it by doing better.
Karma means your words, quest-ions, and your deeds, are like boomerangs. If you are sincere in your efforts, you will find the answers. The answers may require that you make adaptations. If you make those adjustments, you will receive what a person who lives by those words receives (don't use the shotgun approach--because scattered ideas are unfocused efforts).
My question is, "Who would be on this ship?" As he spoke further, he extrapolated that most governments would probably not want to invest in such a project, since this ship would be leaving and never coming back. Brilliant deduction! Therefore he concluded, that the passengers would (in all likelihood) be the ones who could finance their own trip to RECOLONIZE on another planet--whether or whether not there would be other inhabitants. My third eye mind considered, "Oh, so only the extremely wealthy can afford to get away from a dying planet like planet Krypton (the comic book character Superman's home planet), so how many Blacks would be licensed to take such a trip or given such a special invite? And how typical a White way of thinking, to intrude on other inhabitants--invited or not!
I began to realize, how often when Whites are speaking about events and solutions for their own people--that we (as Black people) automatically begin to include ourselves in the equation--when (in reality), there is no real suggestion presented to support that theory. Meaning, when they say "for the future of our people," we Blacks in the West automatically think they mean all the people. Now what kind of fantasy are we living in: the same one that naively doesn't want to believe that Europe committed three holocausts against the Jewish people? The one that doesn't want to believe that there were more Black people lost at sea, as a result slavery in America--than all the Jews lost in the Holocaust? Maybe the one that doesn't believe that South Africa once had 85% of the indigenous Black population living on 15% of the land, while Whites used the rest of that land for personal ownership and recreational areas--like huge golf courses (meanwhile projecting an image that so-called Africa is a mismanaged wasteland of uncontrolled vegetation)?
By the deeds Westerners display around the world, concerning other indigenous people, I don't think the leadership in Kenya will be thinking that this Western rocket ship would be making accommodation for wealthy Blacks in their areas--particularly if they are not the British authorities that Mr. Hawking works in behalf of. Surely, the Black man in Central Asia could not have much confidence or faith, that he would be included on that ship constructed by the West: I don't believe, not even half as much, as this quadriplegic scientist obviously believed he would be included. And although this is British government we are talking about, I can't imagine--given the chronicle of the Blackman in America--why any of us Blacks, in the wilderness of North America, should believe we'd be in that number--either. Though, I'm very sure, there are quite a number of our own people who would believe that Blacks would be included.
Sometimes, I perceive we--as Black people--are too willing to go by our own beliefs, rather than face cold, hard facts! Nowhere, in the history of Whites, had Westerners done anything without their immediate benefit being considered and rewarded first! Nowhere, in the history of Western colonization, has the original inhabitants of colonized areas, ever fared out well by the considerations of Whites in those occupied areas!
Every other type of etnicity around the world has a "sob" story to tell, concerning the White man taking land and natural resources from their country, while getting very little or nothing comparable in return. This is in light of the fact--according to ethnogenesis--Whites are the last to appear in the chronology of man. So why should we believe that the policy has changed, given the practice of their White ancestry? And if we don't believe-- then why are we not sending our children to more engineering schools and taking advantage of the affirmative action programs, made to assist "minorities" in the fields of medicine and technology? Why are we not collectively preparing ourselves overall, on the basis of this awareness:
St. Luke Chapter 12:47: "And that servant which knew his Lord's will and prepared
not himself, neither did according to His will shall be beaten with many stripes."
I am fully aware that it takes more effort to make things right--but while there is always difficulties associated with starting anything-- if there is no pain then there is no gain. . .
I guess, it makes things easier to sit back and do nothing--in reference to events--and let the next generation inherit the job of saving our species. Whites seem to worship, statistics, politics, theories, theorems-- while we Blacks seem to place too much on faith and the Creator making sure He "sees us through." While I subscribe to providence, and manifest destiny for Black people, I am not so crazy about all this vicarious and precarious behavior demonstrated by current day Blacks within the West-- particularly relying on other's sense of humanity without any very viable options.
Not that I'm so inclined to the excessive use of force, but of all the countries displaying nuclear capabilities and showcasing a space program--how many of these would you say are represented by people of substantial pigmentation? Really? Examine it for yourself...
I'm just saying though... When you don't have the ability to defend yourself, there's always bullies out there waiting to take advantage of your position. Just study the Faulklands Crisis [two articles]. Implied--but not stated--that because these islands had names for water bodies, their must have been indigenous people before the English and Spain "discovered" the Fauklands...
I am not saying that there has not been improvement in the West, concerning their sense of humanity (I suppose), but as another group of people with a separate destiny--why should we depend on anyone else to be fair--for us to get equal rights and privileges in the dual society in which we live? It is as if the known world believes the world should be ruled by a Western hand. Given our ethnogenesis--we should have better options than the ones presently presented. Imagine your kid--all grown up as a behemoth, asking you to do something nicely, while toting a big club behind his back--just in case you don't )... Looking like Teddy Roosevelt.
But I digress. This is not even my overall topic or my perspective. It is not about might and such, but I just thought you should be aware of what is the obvious playing field (at least to my persons). Now back to self development of the mental kind...
It is quite difficult to understand why as a people, we continue this tenuous relationship with the West. Some times when an animal is abused enough, the pain becomes ordinary and the animal gets accustomed to such behavior. Hopefully this is not the case with us in America. My heart does not want to believe that, but regardless--I will accept that if it is true. Yet, I see efforts being made in small clusters. I just consider that some of you were like me in my previous life-- I just was not aware of so much and therefore I didn't do much-- but once I found out... And that is just it: If you sincerely seek, you will find/ if you knock the door will open-- but only if you mean it. You show you mean it by your actions. If you know better, then you show you mean it by doing better.
Karma means your words, quest-ions, and your deeds, are like boomerangs. If you are sincere in your efforts, you will find the answers. The answers may require that you make adaptations. If you make those adjustments, you will receive what a person who lives by those words receives (don't use the shotgun approach--because scattered ideas are unfocused efforts).
As expressed to you before, I am not a person who subscribes to organized religion. Supreme consciousness needs no middle man. In the way that I perceive it, it is not:
It is more of a direct line of communication:
This is not to disavow the wisdom books written by godly inspired men. Quite the contrary, it only proves my point that God needs no middle man. The Creator created all for a purpose only the Creator was aware of. The things created serve that purpose. All things created are but vessels of that purpose-- vehicles to express that purpose. When one comes in contact with another form created by the Creator, they communicate. The communique is done through the vehicles of the senses or through sound utterances through one's native tongue. The Creator communicates through conscience with The One Who Creates; being the Supreme or Ultimate form of Awareness (or consciousness). We grow in consciousness through the interaction of form (experience), or through what we understand of those experiences-- whether they be direct communication (speaking), empathy, sympathy, compassion (perceive or concur with the path of others), or frequency (vibes, vibration, feel, feelings).
Our own vessel and the quest for awareness, is our direct access to that consciousness-- the right questions makes our vehicles to take that journey-- THERE IS NO NEED FOR INTERMEDIARIES like the preacher man. Religion is as individual as fingerprints or grains of sand. The paths are directly communicated based upon conscience. Whatever premise or virtues you base your life upon, the compassion of The One who creates provides the journey, and the possibility of a total understanding-- based upon our individual purpose and goals; not through means of an expert in the field of divinity who does so for pay!
Besides, when Blacks in America are practicing Christianity, our people are practicing what was given to us in slavery to quell resistance. The form of Christianity is what the West did with the practice--which is different within the East and Greece--whose origin begins in what Jesus and the Essene practiced; an Aramaic Chaldaic form of Hebrew teachings.
Creator + man (or woman) of divinity + divinity within = you and proper guidance:
It is more of a direct line of communication:
Creator + divinity within = you.
This is not to disavow the wisdom books written by godly inspired men. Quite the contrary, it only proves my point that God needs no middle man. The Creator created all for a purpose only the Creator was aware of. The things created serve that purpose. All things created are but vessels of that purpose-- vehicles to express that purpose. When one comes in contact with another form created by the Creator, they communicate. The communique is done through the vehicles of the senses or through sound utterances through one's native tongue. The Creator communicates through conscience with The One Who Creates; being the Supreme or Ultimate form of Awareness (or consciousness). We grow in consciousness through the interaction of form (experience), or through what we understand of those experiences-- whether they be direct communication (speaking), empathy, sympathy, compassion (perceive or concur with the path of others), or frequency (vibes, vibration, feel, feelings).
Our own vessel and the quest for awareness, is our direct access to that consciousness-- the right questions makes our vehicles to take that journey-- THERE IS NO NEED FOR INTERMEDIARIES like the preacher man. Religion is as individual as fingerprints or grains of sand. The paths are directly communicated based upon conscience. Whatever premise or virtues you base your life upon, the compassion of The One who creates provides the journey, and the possibility of a total understanding-- based upon our individual purpose and goals; not through means of an expert in the field of divinity who does so for pay!
Besides, when Blacks in America are practicing Christianity, our people are practicing what was given to us in slavery to quell resistance. The form of Christianity is what the West did with the practice--which is different within the East and Greece--whose origin begins in what Jesus and the Essene practiced; an Aramaic Chaldaic form of Hebrew teachings.
Our growth and development in life is the most magnanimous form of evolution, for we can become better than we were--as well as "dance our way out of our constrictions" (excerpt from the song "One Nation Under A Groove" by George Clinton and Parliament-Funkadelic). We are responsible for our own journeys in life, a preacher can be no more responsible for your guidance, than a doctor can diagnose you without your assistance--through verbal and physical communication. You can be guided by the truth only if you are looking for it, have the tendency to be receptive, and of good conscience and reason; the same tools that will guide you--if you took the journey unassisted. So why pay for it while placing someone above you? Just like you develop your physical muscles--you have to develop your "mental muscles" and expand your memory.
Granted there has been many highly elevated sentient beings incarnated on this plane. Many of these beings walked a path which compulsorily motivates others to move towards more appropriate behavior-- maybe even forego a previous direction; to accompany a path which bears much similarities: Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, Confucius, Moses [Mesh/ Musa], David and his son Solomon, Hiram Abiff, The cult-ure of Ausar- Auset (so called Osiris/Isis in Greek) [3 stories], Kahlil Gibran, Omar Khayyam, Mawlana Rumi, Mahatma Gandhi, Muhammad Ibn Abd Allah Ibn Abn al-Muttalib, Malik Al Hajj Shabazz are some examples of such beings. They were renown throughout the world. They are known as Enlightened Ones and are often quoted. Some religions are erected on the basis of their paths-- but often this is done after their death by others.
In this is a sense that someone is telling you how someone lived after they are gone. This often tends to create over exaggeration, leading to canonisations, folklore and legend. My first point is: Name any religion and its devotees and I will show you that most miss the mark of the title -- meaning technically most cannot fulfill the total obligation the title suggests. In one way or another they all will fall short. Perfection is something to be continuously striving for -- but it itself is not obtainable... Secondly, all of the Enlightened ones spoke concerning the wisdom and understanding that sprung from their beings as something to be reasoned with, not just followed. To reason you must have a basic sense of right and wrong, accompanied by a good conscience. And none of them advocated to be the leader of others. They lead by truth and example. And because of this all of them were in conflict with the government of their respective countries--because they advocate free thinking thought and that limits the power of the middle man. They were just in communique with the highest and Most Ultimate form of Awareness, they considered with good conscience and reasoning, with the rest being for the Chronicles. They had no middle men guiding them. We may reason with each other in good conscience, but it is up to the individual to find the answers to their questions.
In this is a sense that someone is telling you how someone lived after they are gone. This often tends to create over exaggeration, leading to canonisations, folklore and legend. My first point is: Name any religion and its devotees and I will show you that most miss the mark of the title -- meaning technically most cannot fulfill the total obligation the title suggests. In one way or another they all will fall short. Perfection is something to be continuously striving for -- but it itself is not obtainable... Secondly, all of the Enlightened ones spoke concerning the wisdom and understanding that sprung from their beings as something to be reasoned with, not just followed. To reason you must have a basic sense of right and wrong, accompanied by a good conscience. And none of them advocated to be the leader of others. They lead by truth and example. And because of this all of them were in conflict with the government of their respective countries--because they advocate free thinking thought and that limits the power of the middle man. They were just in communique with the highest and Most Ultimate form of Awareness, they considered with good conscience and reasoning, with the rest being for the Chronicles. They had no middle men guiding them. We may reason with each other in good conscience, but it is up to the individual to find the answers to their questions.
Each journey is a unique and direct communique with the One who creates for the Creator's purpose; each a distinct ritual based upon the development of the person. Religion is a personal journey laid out by the essence of the Creator within each vessel. The key ingredient is the rituals which 'religion'-- or ties (ligion) you back (re) to The source where all come from.
Not that I am making ridicule of any one's religion, but logically if one created everything from something which is in one's own essence, it essentially stands to reason that the thing created and the one who created are still linked: like the almost infinite amount of cells that make up the body which you experience as one body!
In the realm of people, we as Black people need to unlearn a lot of concepts learned when we took on this language I am speaking. This is not my original tongue, but it will do for now, however--when my Central Asian brothers and sisters use English, they do not use it in the same way I do. They visualize and conceptualize in their native tongue and translate that into the English language. This is a very fundamental difference. Their ethnogenesis started with an ideology about the greatness of Black people and their culture. Sacred figures that resemble them. Concepts concerning them and a world with Black man, woman and child as the most important people. The English culture, custom or ideology (nor American ideology) is not where the Central Asian is coming from when he/or she uses the English language-- unless he has been Western indoctrinated. He is conceptualizing in his cultural parameters and translating into English.
As for the Black in America, unless he is fighting for his/her own liberation-- he or she is more than likely conceptually coming from American indoctrination. His concepts are derived from what he observes from another people. The values derived from what others say they are, or his spin on what they say concerning. The standards are set by another people and their way becomes the phenomena that Blacks extract from, to make sense of it in our own Black third eye mind.
NEXT: HOW TO FREE ONE'S MIND FROM WESTERN MISCONCEPTIONS
Peace and Blessings,
C. Be'erla Hai-roi Myers
Not that I am making ridicule of any one's religion, but logically if one created everything from something which is in one's own essence, it essentially stands to reason that the thing created and the one who created are still linked: like the almost infinite amount of cells that make up the body which you experience as one body!
In the realm of people, we as Black people need to unlearn a lot of concepts learned when we took on this language I am speaking. This is not my original tongue, but it will do for now, however--when my Central Asian brothers and sisters use English, they do not use it in the same way I do. They visualize and conceptualize in their native tongue and translate that into the English language. This is a very fundamental difference. Their ethnogenesis started with an ideology about the greatness of Black people and their culture. Sacred figures that resemble them. Concepts concerning them and a world with Black man, woman and child as the most important people. The English culture, custom or ideology (nor American ideology) is not where the Central Asian is coming from when he/or she uses the English language-- unless he has been Western indoctrinated. He is conceptualizing in his cultural parameters and translating into English.
As for the Black in America, unless he is fighting for his/her own liberation-- he or she is more than likely conceptually coming from American indoctrination. His concepts are derived from what he observes from another people. The values derived from what others say they are, or his spin on what they say concerning. The standards are set by another people and their way becomes the phenomena that Blacks extract from, to make sense of it in our own Black third eye mind.
NEXT: HOW TO FREE ONE'S MIND FROM WESTERN MISCONCEPTIONS
Peace and Blessings,
C. Be'erla Hai-roi Myers
No comments:
Post a Comment